By: Michael Fuhlhage (AJHA President) & Erin Coyle (AJHA First Vice President)

The ad hoc Defense of History Committee has begun work to collect the oral histories and track the erasure and alteration of the historical record at public sites.

The committee’s charge is to give voice to members whose academic freedom is being violated, to chronicle challenges our scholars face, and to give all AJHA members the means to help track the erasure of diversity, equity, and inclusion in the nation’s history at public institutions where Americans expect to learn about our nation’s history. Such places include national parks, federal and state historic sites, museums, and other places where the public encounters history.

The committee wants to give you an opportunity to be part of the historical record while protecting your identity in case you fear reprisal for speaking out. And we need your help in spotting instances where public sites are altering the historical record under pressure from federal and state authorities. Here’s how you can be heard.

Oral history: Oral history is a valuable method for recording contemporary conceptions of challenges. Thus, our committee plans to perform oral history interviews to record people's perceptions of whether and how laws, policies, and practices are changing how people may teach journalism history and perform research on the history of journalism. This part of the research will begin in the summer and continue in the fall. Anyone interested in participating in an oral history interview may contact this committee by sending an email to academicfreedomresearch@proton.me.

Tracking historical erasure: The committee has begun gathering published reports of the removal of references to controversial subjects and alteration of the description of events that sanitizes the past. And we invite you to contribute by submitting an “I want to report historical erasure” request. The form asks for the following information:

• Name of historic site affected.
• Erasure or other alteration done to the site.
• Reason given for the change, if any.
• Group whose history was removed or altered.
• A link to a published description of the alteration.
• A link to the website of the site that was affected.
• Location of the affected site.

The committee will use this information to create an interactive map chronicling historical alteration and erasure. Contributors will not be identified; your identity won’t even be collected. The committee will verify contributed information before adding it to this crowdsourced map of historical amnesia.

Your contributions are important to both the oral history and the historical mapping projects. There are only a few Defense of History committee members, after all, but there are many AJHA members and other scholars. You know that saying that many hands make light work? Many eyes do the same, and the eyes of our members are all over the country. Please join us in chronicling the current moment.

Editor's Note: This piece is a follow up to "Introducing the Defense of History Committee" published in February 2026.

Jeremiah Favara is a feminist media studies scholar and assistant professor of communication studies at Gonzaga University.

How did you become involved with AJHA?

I first became involved with AJHA as a graduate student. When I was working on my dissertation, my advisor—Dr. Carol Stabile—suggested I submit my dissertation for the AJHA’s Blanchard Prize. I was fortunate to be recognized as an honorable mention awardee and had the opportunity to attend the annual conference in Salt Lake City, Utah in 2018. That was my first time attending AJHA and getting involved. 

How did you develop an interest in media history?

I somewhat stumbled upon my interest in media history as I was conducting research for my book (Tactical Inclusion: Difference and Vulnerability in the U.S. Military Advertising, 2024, University of Illinois Press). I really wanted to explore the ways the U.S. military used messages of difference and diversity in their advertising and how those messages changed over time. It wasn’t until I got into the archives and started looking through materials, collecting ads from magazines, and finding really interesting documents or pieces of media that I realized just how exciting working in media history could be. There’s such a special feeling about going through archives and finding sources that lead you to new questions and insights.

Your recent book Tactical Inclusion relies on material from military archives. What was the process for gaining access to those archives? What advice do you have for other researchers working in military archives?

I found it really difficult to gain access to official military records throughout the research process. I tried a few Freedom of Information Act requests and tried contacting various military personnel to get information and gain access to different military records and archives but kept hitting walls. I turned to archives of advertising companies that had contracts for recruitment advertising. One of the most helpful archives was the Hartman Center for Sales, Advertising & Marketing History at Duke University. There were several collections for ad agencies that had contracts with various military branches during the time period I was focused on. I found such a treasure trove of materials in my time at the Hartman Center.

I would really encourage other researchers doing work on or about the military to be persistent. There were many materials that I got access to on the fifth and sixth attempt. I would also say to lean on the expertise of librarians and archivists. I learned about so many materials, collections, and resources from the insights of all the librarians and archivists that helped me as I worked on the book.

In previous conversations about Tactical Inclusion, you mentioned being struck by how extensive military advertising and the variety of media produced by the military. What piece of media did you find most surprising or interesting?

It’s hard to pick just one thing, because I found so many surprising and interesting things. I’d say the most surprising piece of media I found was a print poster for the Marine Corps that showed a picture of a young woman serving coffee to a group of men contrasted with a smaller photo her in uniform with the heading, “In the Marine Corps, you’ll serve the country, not the coffee.” The poster was from the 1970s and really showed me how extensively the Marine Corps, the branch most explicitly connected with man and warrior masculinity, sought to reach out to women as potential recruits while also dictating the narrow ways in which women could be included.

How does your expertise in feminist media studies inform your teaching?

My expertise in feminist media studies informs my teaching in a couple of ways. First of all, it really influences the content I draw on when designing classes. Most of my classes engage a variety of interdisciplinary literature from fields like media studies, feminist theory, queer theory, and queer of color critique. I try to bind all my classes together with a focus on social justice, informed by a feminist perspective. I feel really lucky to be at a mission-driven institution – Gonzaga University – where several of the tenets of the university’s mission align with intersectional feminist ideas of justice and liberation.

What hobbies or activities do you enjoy outside of academia?

One of the gifts of being where I am, in Spokane, Washington, is really convenient access to the outdoors and great trails, so I try to spend a lot of time outside. I really enjoy trail running, snowboarding, bike riding, surfing, and going hiking with my partner and our dog.

By: Jennifer E. Moore

Greetings, colleagues!

The 45th annual AJHA Convention is going coast to coast this year, moving from the Pacific shores of Long Beach, California, to the heart of Greenville, South Carolina. This year’s conference is later than usual, November 5-7, 2026, at the Westin Poinsett Hotel. Plan accordingly. Our board continues to recommend that the submission deadline remains close to our usual June deadline. Original research papers, panels, and research in progress submissions are due June 15, 2026 (11:59 p.m. CST). Visit the AJHA website see the full call. 

As your Research Committee Chair, I’m also writing to clarify some of the long-held guidelines our organization has honored to ensure we continue our tradition of excellence that defines our gathering—from students to senior scholars, along with the journalists we honor and the local community members we welcome each year. Page limits, formatting, blind review requirements, and required components are essential to make the process go smoothly for all involved. Submissions that do not meet guidelines may not be considered.

Please remember that AJHA permits one entry per competition category. If you choose to submit in more than one category, your topic areas must be significantly different from one another. Submissions must be original and not under review elsewhere.

Individuals may participate on only one panel, and moderators may not also serve as panelists. These policies are not merely procedural; they also help make sure we have a diversity of topics, broad participation, and a program that reflects the richness of our field.

Please consider submitting your own work, encourage your students to submit, and share our convention call broadly with colleagues on your campus and beyond. Our strength as an organization depends on seasoned scholars, emerging researchers, and those who work closely with graduate students seeing AJHA as a vibrant and welcoming home for their scholarship.

This year, there are some new colleagues helping with the competition. I’m grateful to Dianne Bragg, who is serving in her new role coordinating Panel submissions, and Patrick File, who is overseeing Research in Progress submissions this year. I also want to extend heartfelt thanks to outgoing Panel coordinator Susan Swanberg and Research in Progress coordinator Gwyneth Mellinger for their thoughtful leadership and dedicated service.

Speaking of service, this is my third and final year serving as Research Committee Chair. Who wants to step up and serve? I welcome the opportunity to train and mentor anyone interested in stepping into this role. It has been an honor to serve, and I’m committed to a smooth transition.

Ready, set, write! See you in Greenville this November.

Jennifer E. Moore is an associate professor at the University of Minnesota Duluth and the AJHA Research Committee Chair.

Joe Jones is an assistant professor of journalism in the Reed School of Media and Communications at West Virginia University.

How did you become involved with AJHA?

In 2017 during my doctoral program, I was a research assistant for longtime member, Earnest Perry. While looking up some research for him, I found some fascinating documents on the tobacco industry and funding of the Black press. We then started a side project and dug a little deeper. He then recommended we take it to AJHA which was in Salt Lake City in 2018. I met some other early career folks there like Bailey Dick and Ashley Walters and the rest was history (pun intended)! 

You describe yourself as an interdisciplinary scholar, how does that outlook inform your research?

I received my bachelor’s in history in the early 2000s at a small liberal arts school. At that time, postmodernism had challenged the fundamentals of the discipline. One response was to approach the world as radically interconnected, resisting the silos of discipline-specific thinking. I was also taking classes on philosophy, global politics (9/11 was a big influence on my course selection), gender, and colonization. Combine this with my master’s degree in German history (and the work of the Frankfurt School) and the advanced feminist theory of my doctoral program, and my research took on a specific flavor.

Basically, I found I couldn’t talk about anything without talking about history, power, and ethics. In my mind, to adequately understand any phenomenon we need to think about how it developed over time (history), how it is implicated in relations of power (sociology, political economy, Critical/Cultural theory), and how it contributes to living a good life or not (ethics). Given my undergrad training, I even see history itself as inherently interdisciplinary. To do good history you need to have a fundamental understanding of politics, how social structures work, a grasp on the mechanisms of culture, etc. And what’s the point of talking about history if not to live a better life or cultivate wisdom?

So, for example, in my research on food journalism I have to look at how it developed from the women’s pages and evolved into “lifestyle” content (history-shout out to Kim Voss), how it can potentially serve hegemonic notions of consumer culture and industrialized food production (power), and how it might operate to improve the lives of community members entangled in various systems of power, culture, discourse, and resource distribution (ethics).

My research on the Black press certainly involves history, but I am also interested in how Black journalists and media makers negotiated structural limitations (power) and responded with different orientations towards the world and ways of doing (ethics). My work on AI in media examines how the news and other media industries developed their economic models over time (history-power), how AI is currently employed, and what implications these hold for our moral autonomy and democratic worldmaking (ethics). I also look at the fundamental misunderstandings of what AI is—with such misinformation perpetuated by industry interests and routine-following journalists—and correcting these misperceptions to bring focus back to where we might assert our humanity (power-ethics). So, I’d probably consider my work on AI transdisciplinary but really, I can’t even imagine what my research would look like without a baseline of being interdisciplinary.

What makes you most excited about teaching or research?

As far as teaching, there is just something about talking with students and not knowing what’s going to come up or what kind of insights you’ll witness in real time. I teach courses on ethics, law, sociology, theory, and even my history course is more Socratic and conversational than a traditional lecture. It’s these conversations that get me most excited about teaching and the notion that I’m not just conveying information, I’m helping people develop their own sense of (socially grounded) self and moral character.

I get the most satisfaction when students tell me how a course made them rethink their relationship to the world and what they have the ability to do. My program, for example, has a lot of sports media majors (I try to convince them to think of themselves as sports journalists). One of these students recently told me that in his sports classes, he can tell which students have and haven’t taken my ethics course yet. Those who had, he argued, were more informed, attentive, critical, and caring, asking more piercing questions and pushing class conversations in more fruitful directions (well, he said this in so many words). Helping students to ask meaningful questions and having the confidence to assert their informed views and morally preferable ways of doing? Yes please!

Talking with students also helps keep me grounded. If I could have my way (and I’m glad I can’t), I would probably read books and just think abstract thoughts all day.

As far as research, I’m under no illusions that what I’m doing will radically alter the world. But at the very least, it does radically change who I am. Undertaking a new research project means I will learn something new, see things differently, and appreciate life all the more. Ideally, I can use this in my teaching, my service, my daily life as a community member, partner, and friend, to help improve the world in whatever small way I can. I also hold out hope that someone who reads my work (should I be so lucky!), will have their perspective changed, even in the slightest way, that helps bend the moral arc of the universe more towards justice, care, and those things necessary for our collective flourishing. We humans have so much potential for genuine happiness and wisdom, and research is my own humble means of helping to cultivate that potential.

As someone who co-led a study abroad course, what advice or lessons would you have for other faculty in that position?

First, if you have the opportunity, do it! I’ve done it three times now and each time is a lifelong memory. A related bit of advice is to be honest with students about the experience and not romanticize it. Yes, it’s potentially fun and exciting. But studying abroad is also about making yourself uncomfortable in a way that encourages greater understanding and growth. It’s not a vacation, it’s a learning experience, and there will be times when students (and you!) are confused, frustrated, and maybe even homesick. This is all part of it. Some of those challenging times can even make for some of the strongest memories.

Second, I’d recommend an assignment that helps ground students. My own trip is built around art, design, and culture, so the first assignment is something called “Design Connections” where each student picks out some element (like doors, statues, street art/graffiti, archways, fountains, etc.) and has to document different iterations as we tour around. Being in a foreign country can be overwhelming, so giving something students to focus on can be quite helpful. Students also talk to each other about their chosen element, so they’ll even collaborate and point things out to each other. The assignment then requires students to articulate the differences and similarities between how these elements manifest and are used compared to back home.

Another useful assignment plays to the strengths of media students where, as a class, we create a culture/lifestyle magazine of our host culture. Students pitch their own stories, take their own photos, do research, identify sources, and really talk things out to articulate the cultural nuances they have observed. While each student has their own story, they are also encouraged to help each other by bouncing ideas of one another and sharing photos. Students thus have a sense of ownership over a specific cultural aspect while also engaging in conversations that help them reflect on the experiences they are having.

So in a nutshell, recognizing the challenges of studying abroad while also having very intentional assignments is key.

What hobbies or activities do you enjoy outside of academia?

I love to eat, so I also love to cook! Living so often in my head as we all do, it’s nice to do something physical and have a delicious outcome at the end of it. On a related note, I also like to swim, bicycle, hike, and paddleboard (and West Virginia is certainly great for such activities). Above all, I love spending time with my wife, going on long walks or dwelling over meals as we talk about life, wonder at the silliness of us humans, or contemplate the meaning of it all!

By: Michael Fuhlhage, AJHA President

The academic freedom of AJHA members is under growing threat as a result of state-level anti-DEI legislation enacted since 2023 and executive orders imposed since Donald Trump’s second presidential administration began in January 2025. In response, as president of the American Journalism Historians Association, I have established the Ad Hoc Defense of History Committee with these charges:

• To give voice to our more vulnerable members who may fear retribution if they speak against violations of their academic freedom.
• To chronicle the challenges our scholars face.
• And to give all AJHA members the means to help track the erasure of diversity, equity, and inclusion in public institutions where Americans expect to learn about our nation’s history, both the good and the bad.

By doing these things, we aspire to strengthen the academy, bolster accountability for our country’s deeds in the past as well as the present, and guard against the erasure of historical memory.

I am thankful to AJHA Vice President Erin Coyle, who will chair the committee, and AJHA members Deborah van Tuyll of Augusta University, Gwyneth Mellinger of James Madison University, Marquita Smith of the University of Mississippi, A.J. Bauer of the University of Alabama, and Susan Swanberg of the University of Arizona for agreeing to serve on the committee.

Threatening teachers and scholars for our discussion of race in the fabric of American society and history and all matters of diversity, equity, and inclusion is just part of an arc of tyranny under Trump’s second administration.

This arc extends from the classroom into the streets of Minneapolis and every place where the administration has run past its immigration enforcement responsibilities to quash dissent.

• Its agents have killed eight people in 2026: Alex Pretti, Renee Nicole Good, Luis Gustavo Nuñez Cáceres, Geraldo Lunas Campos, Víctor Manuel Díaz, Parady La, Luis Beltrán Yáñez-Cruz, and Heber Sánchez Domínguez.
• It has, as the American Civil Liberties Union states in a lawsuit against ICE, CBP, and other federal agents, violated the constitutional rights of Americans “by racially profiling, unlawfully seizing, and unlawfully arresting people without a warrant and without probable cause” because of racial and ethnic characteristics.
• It has threatened, arrested, and detained observers who sought to collect evidence that could hold Immigration and Customs Enforcement and Border Patrol agents accountable, as detailed in a KQED news podcast.
• And it has assaulted and arrested reporters covering anti-ICE protests, treating journalists as agitators and participants, according to the U.S. Press Freedom Tracker, which accuses police of using arrests to silence protest coverage.

These pieces add up to a picture of a federal government attempting to evade accountability in the present. But it is also trying to hide the evidence of its historical misdeeds and prevent educators from even discussing them when they pertain to the racism in America’s past. Historical memory and teaching are under siege. Our public museums and public lands are in the crosshairs. At the expense of telling a complete history of the United States that includes an accounting of not just its triumphs but also its less noble chapters, the Trump administration has targeted the Smithsonian Institution with a comprehensive review of selected museums and exhibitions.

The administration framed this review as an effort to “reflect the unity, progress, and enduring values that define the American story” in the name of ensuring “alignment with the President’s directive to celebrate American exceptionalism, remove divisive or partisan narratives, and restore confidence in our shared cultural institutions.” This includes a review of exhibition text, websites, educational materials, and social media content with an eye on “tone, historical framing, and alignment with American ideals.”

The result will be the substitution of the triumphalist history of great white men and their institutions that James W. Carey warned we didn’t need more of for the whole truth that recent generations of historians have labored to build. Most recently, Trump officials ordered national parks to remove signs and displays about settlers mistreatment of Native Americans at the Grand Canyon and George Washington’s ownership of enslaved people at the President’s House in Philadelphia.

Since 2023, Republican lawmakers have been targeting colleges that emphasize diversity, equity and inclusion in their recruitment and retention of students and faculty on grounds that these efforts violate free speech and waste public funds. In 2025, state legislatures enacted 14 laws in 12 states to dismantle DEI efforts, according to the Chronicle of Higher Education. Targets include DEI offices and training, diversity statements, and teaching about white supremacy in courses required to graduate. These efforts, the Chronicle reports, were accelerated by Trump’s executive orders banning race-conscious programs, and they reach as far as the academic freedom of classroom instruction. In Mississippi, for example, HB 1193 prohibits teaching concepts that include “transgender ideology, gender-neutral pronouns, heteronormativity, gender theory, sexual privilege, or any related formulation of these concepts” in any university program, academic course, or office.

New laws constrain the academic freedom of administrators as well as teachers. In Iowa, HF 856 barred administrators from referencing “unconscious or implicit bias, cultural appropriation, allyship, transgender ideology, microaggressions, group marginalization, antiracism, systemic oppression, social justice, intersectionality, neopronouns, heteronormativity, disparate impact, gender theory, racial privilege, sexual privilege, or any related formulation of these concepts” in programs, training, or policies. Texas’s SB 37 went so far as to give public colleges’ boards of regents curricular control to prevent courses from including DEI and establishing a DEI complaint process and a statewide committee to determine what curricula should include.

These concerns are not abstract. AJHA members are affected in a variety of ways expressed privately in conversations at our conventions in Pittsburgh and Long Beach and in discussions via social media. When an instructor was suspended in Texas for including transgender identity in her teaching, it was chilling. Could the same happen to any of us?

My hope is that the AJHA Defense of History Committee can fashion a process through which members can confidentially deposit their accounts of living with DEI restrictions. What is the use of this? To ensure that the vulnerable are heard without fear of retribution. These accounts will be part of the historical record and part of historical accountability in the future.

I also hope that it can devise a clearinghouse for members to report instances where diversity is erased as part of journalism, media and communication history in their own locales, a sort of crowdsourced database of historical amnesia. Members could then engage in acts of guerrilla history, replacing the deleted diversity aspects in rebellious acts of remembering.

James Baldwin wrote in Notes of a Native Son, “I love America more than any other country in this world, and, exactly for this reason, I insist on the right to criticize her perpetually.” To criticize honestly and rigorously, we must have evidence. The Defense of History Committee will provide the ideas and means to implement the collection of that evidence.

How did you become involved with AJHA?

I found out about the AJHA via American Journalism and the annual conferences. Professor Kathleen Endres, whose work I had long admired, introduced me to several folks at my first AJHA conference many years ago! 

How did you develop your interest in the nineteenth century and media history in the South?

This may be a combination of a couple of different motivations. First, I was born in North Carolina and had a strong interest in the South growing up. That upbringing dovetailed with my father’s interest in the nineteenth century and specifically in early periodicals. He was a literature professor at the University of South Florida and introduced me to the fascinating world of journalism history.

How have you seen your field change since you started?

It has changed a great deal, and for the better in my opinion. We are much more attuned to the journalistic work of marginalized peoples, which has revealed really valuable history, some of which I wrote about in Women Writers and Journalists in the Nineteenth Century South (Cambridge, 2011).

You have been interviewed by a variety of news outlets, podcasts, and public organizations. What advice do you have for other researchers who want to engage in public scholarship?

It is important, of course, to know your audience so that you can pitch your responses the right way. And it is also important to be brief in your answers—something I’m very much still working on!

What hobbies or activities do you enjoy outside of academia?

I am a big baseball fan and also enjoy traveling and hiking.

Jonathan Daniel Wells is a professor of history in the departments of Afroamerican and African Studies, history, and the Residential College at the University of Michigan. His most recent publication The New York Kidnapping Club: Wall Street and Slavery before the Civil War (2020) won the New York Library Society Book Award 2020-2021 and the Victorian Society Book Award.

By: Anthony Montalto

What started as a retreat for professors to take a step back and share research has blossomed into a thriving yearly conference for scholars of journalism history to connect.

On Feb. 7, 2026, the American Journalism Historians Association will hold its annual Southeast Symposium in Panama City Beach, Florida. Last February, 16 students attended the Symposium and gave presentations on topics ranging from method acting, to media coverage of Olympic gymnastics, to how cult leaders used media to brainwash their followers.

As in previous years, the 2025 symposium began on a Friday night, with students and faculty from five universities gathering to share a meal together. In true Gulf Coast fashion—it was seafood! Saturday morning, the conference room buzzed as the group prepared for a day of swapping experiences and knowledge.

For many student presenters, this was the first time they had shared their work at a conference. University of Alabama graduate student Lyric Franklin was one of the presenters.

“My favorite part was having the experience of presenting my work at a conference, getting to meet other students, and learning about their journalism passions,” Franklin said about the event.

Attendees also heard from David Bulla and 2025 AJHA President Debbie van Tuyll, editors of the Southeastern Review of Journalism History. Bulla and van Tuyll shared the journal’s story and described the process of submitting a paper for publication.

Beyond the presentations, the symposium was a place for students and faculty alike to bond over a shared love of history. University of Alabama graduate student Chloe Rigdon summed it all up: “Meeting professors from other universities, and gaining career advice from them, was such a valuable experience. I am so grateful I was able to attend this conference!”

The 2026 AJHA Southeast Symposium will be Feb. 6-8 in Panama City Beach, Florida. For more information about participating in 2027, contact Dianne Bragg at dmbragg@ua.edu.

Anthony Montalto is a Master's student at the University of Alabama.

Editor’s Note: This release was originally published by the Indigenous Journalists Association and reposted with permission.

Indigenous Journalists Association President Sunnie Clahchischiligi (Diné) appointed Melissa Greene-Blye (Miami Tribe of Oklahoma) to fill the board vacancy left by Jourdan Bennett-Begaye (Diné), who stepped down last month. The board voted to approve Greene-Blye during the Dec. 4 board meeting.

Melissa Greene-Blye (Miami Tribe of Oklahoma) worked as an anchor and reporter for 20 years in the news business, covering local news in television markets big and small. She enjoys using her knowledge and experience to educate the newest generation of journalists.

Greene-Blye is the director of the Center for Indigenous Student Media and is a professor in the William Allen White School of Journalism and Mass Communications at the University of Kansas where she created and directs the KU Native Storytelling Workshop, a summer media workshop for Indigenous high school students, and is the faculty supervisor for Good Morning Indian Country, an award-winning student-led weekly Native news and information program produced collaboratively by students from KU and Haskell Indian Nations University. She serves as chair of the IJA Education Committee and also serves on the board of IndiJ Public Media.

Clahchischiligi said she is appreciative of Bennett-Begaye’s service to the organization and that Greene-Blye is an excellent candidate to fill the appointment.

“I offer my deepest gratitude to Jourdan for her contribution to IJA and its members,” Clahchischiligi said. “And I extend that gratitude to Melissa, who has agreed to step in. She is a longtime IJA member who has already demonstrated a steadfast commitment to serve the organization.”

The remaining officers and members will continue to serve on the board of directors for the duration of their elected terms.

Kimberly Voss is a professor of journalism in the Nicholson School of Communication and Media at the University of Central Florida. Her recent research has examined culinary journalism and women in the media during the mid-twentieth century.

How did you become involved with AJHA?

My dissertation advisor Dr. Maurine Beasley introduced me to AJHA. I attended my first AJHA conference in Wichita, Kansas in 2006. I have attended many AJHA conferences ever since and thoroughly enjoyed the experiences. My favorite conference was in 2016 in St. Petersburg. I was able to give the Donna Allen Award to food editor Janet Keeler.

What media artifacts or questions are you examining in your current book project?

I am looking at the papers of the Miami Herald beauty editor and advice columnist Eleanor Hazlett, who wrote under the name of Eleanor Hart in the 1950s and 1960s. Her papers reveal what was a significant part of the women’s pages of newspapers. I am also working on a project about wine journalism history in the women’s pages, focusing on Ruth Ellen Church.

What tips or advice do you have for others interested in researching the history of food media?

Scholars should look at the stories that have not been told, especially food journalism from the Midwest. Those stories are often overlooked by scholarship about food on the coasts or the South. Overall, in the 1950s and 1960s, newspaper food journalism has always been framed as simplistic. It was much more than that.

How do you balance finding time for research with your other roles?

I try to make sure conference papers turn into books or journal articles. I also try to make sure that one project leads to another.

What hobbies or activities do you enjoy outside of academia?

I cook and bake—often based on recipes from historical newspapers. I garden and am looking into newspaper garden columns which were once common. I have also become a track fan since my high school son runs and jumps.

The American Journalism Historians Association annual convention returned to California for the first time in 24 years for its 44th meeting held September 25-27, 2025. About ninety scholars attended sessions on key issues impacting how media history is researched and taught including freedom of speech in the press and on university campuses, artificial intelligence, and capturing untold histories. 

AJHA President Debbie van Tuyll welcomed attendees to Long Beach, California in her opening address before describing new opportunities or areas of growth that media historians should consider. van Tuyll acknowledged that some communications scholars believe journalism history is in a “rut,” but argued that contextualizing historical research and examining the bigger picture of media within history can help students and other scholars recognize the importance of the field. She also noted that journalists and academics are experiencing similar attacks against their right to free speech. Drawing on her own expertise in Civil War journalism, van Tuyll encouraged AJHA members to examine how journalists overcame similar threats during war times and use the growing public interest in First Amendment rights to examine free speech in “a systems context.” Those goals, van Tuyll explained, citing a 2024 article from Inside Higher Ed, can be accomplished by refocusing on interdisciplinary research areas and methods, building bridges with transnational critical/cultural scholars, and increased training in quantitative methods. 

The seven paper sessions and eight panels explored research on representation and advocacy in media history, contributions to print and broadcast journalism from the Black Press, and challenges to historical research brought by a decrease in federal funding and threats to free speech. 

Special panels highlighted the life and research of long-time AJHA member Pam Parry who passed earlier this year along panels from American Journalism and the AJHA President each exploring the role of media history and the press in challenging political moments.

Attendees gathered throughout the event to honor dissertation, teaching, lifetime achievement, and book of the year award winners. The 2025 Margaret A. Blanchard Dissertation Prize session featured Robin Sundaramoorthy’s award-winning research on the Federal Communications Commission’s failure to diversify the airwaves in the mid- and late-twentieth century and the important services and community building Black radio stations offered listeners. Holly Swensen’s research on the impact of British media on Australia, Robert O’Sullivan’s study of nationalism and anti-slavery sentiments in the trans-national Irish-American press, and Karlin Andersen Tuttle’s history of five Christian women’s magazines all received honorable mentions.

Keith Greenwood accepted the National Award for Excellence in Teaching and encouraged his fellow educators to help students understand the value of critical thinking, evaluating sources, and investigating new ideas. Patrick Cox, awarded the Sidney Kobre Award for Lifetime Achievement in Journalism History, echoed those ideas in his reflections on running The Wimberley View. Cox reminded attendees that honest mistakes should be acknowledged and forgiven. Additionally, criticism is a natural part of many professions, and their critiques may hold helpful lessons. Applying those ideas to media history research meant removing past blindfolds, view history through multiple viewpoints, and ask difficult questions.  

The AJHA Book of the Year Award featured a talk from the prize’s winning author Gwyneth Mellinger for her monograph, Racializing Objectivity: How the White Southern Press Used Journalism Standards to Defend Jim Crow. Mellinger’s research exposed how White reporters in the South used journalism standards to rationalize White supremacy and resist desegregation during the Jim Crow era. Titles from Ira Chinoy, Jeremiah Favara, along with a collaboration between Larry Heinzerling, Randy Herschaft, and Ann Cooper all received honorable mentions.

Additional research awardees included Mark Bernhardt (Wally Eberhard Award for best Historical Research Paper on Media and War), Kaelyn L. Hannah (Maurine Beasley Award for Outstanding Women’s History Research Paper), Felecia Jones Ross (J. William Snorgrass Award for Outstanding Minority-Journalism Research Paper), Rich Shumate (David Sloan Award for Outstanding Faculty Research Paper), and Erin K. Coyle (Jean Palmegiano Award for Outstanding Transnational Journalism Research Paper). Natascha Toft Roelsgaard also received the Rising Scholar Award from American Journalism. 

Multiple panels and activities highlighted journalism in the greater Los Angeles area and the region’s history. The local panel brought together scholars from two universities in the area and two journalists to examine how community journalism has impacted Los Angeles. 

Later, a poolside reception honored NBC4 “Today in LA” co-anchor Lynette Romero and former editor of Long Beach’s Grunion Gazette Harry Saltzgaver for their contributions to local journalism. Nancy Rivera Brooks, a former deputy business editor at The Los Angeles Times, was honored during the Donna Allen Luncheon for her continued coverage of the Latino community in the region. 

Many attendees enjoyed the convention’s proximity to the ocean with tours of the luxury British passenger ship the Queen Mary, time on the beach, and sightseeing along the boardwalk. Others explored the greater Los Angeles area through daytrips to archives or extended their stay to visit theme parks and national parks. 

van Tuyll thanked local conference organizers Madeleine Lisebland, Noah Arceneaux, and Christina Littlefield along with Aimee Edmondson, Patti Pilburn and Erin Coyle for their administrative efforts in her closing remarks during the business meeting. Outgoing board members Elisabeth Fondren, Tom Mascaro, and Ashley Walter were also acknowledged before confirming Andersen Tuttle, George L. Daniels, and Melissa Greene-Blye as incoming members. Coyle was confirmed as first vice president and Pamela Walck as second vice president before the president’s gavel was turned over to Michael Fuhlhage. The AJHA Auction, raising funds for the Sweeney Graduate Student Travel Fund, held a silent auction and several live mini auctions throughout the conference which raised over $2,700. 

The AJHA convention will be returning to the east coast in 2026 for a meeting in Greenville, South Carolina, November 5-7.